Oral Argument: Chiles v. Salazar | Case No. 24-539 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25

Oral Argument: Chiles v. Salazar | Case No. 24-539 | Oral Argument Date: 10/7/25 Link to Docket: Here Case Preview: Here Question Presented: Whether a law that censors certain conversations between counselors and their clients based on the viewpoints expressed regulates conduct or violates the Free Speech Clause. Oral Advocates: For Petitioner: James A. Campbell, Lansdowne, Va. For United States as Amicus Curiae: Hashim M. Mooppan, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. For Respondent: Shannon W. Stevenson, Colorado Solicitor General Link to Opinion: TBD. Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD. Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD. Timestamps: [00:00:00] Case Preview [00:00:50] Argument Begins [00:00:57] Petitioner Opening Statement [00:02:46] Petitioner Free for All Questions [00:17:59] Petitioner Sequential Questions [00:27:48] United States Opening Statement [00:35:27] United States Sequential Questions [00:45:41] Respondent Opening Statement [01:09:00] Respondent Sequential Questions [01:22:28] Petitioner Rebuttal