Oral Argument: Bowe v. United States | Case No. 24-5438 | Oral Argument Date: 10/14/25

Oral Argument: Bowe v. United States | Case No. 24-5438 | Oral Argument Date: 10/14/25 Link to Docket: Here Case Preview: Here Background: Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), “[ a] claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented in a prior application shall be dismissed. ” (emphasis added). Question Presented: Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to a claim presented in a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. * * * Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E), “[ t]he grant or denial of an authorization by a court of appeals to file a second or successive application shall not be appealable and shall not be the subject of a petition . . . for a writ of certiorari. ” (emphasis added). Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) deprives this Court of certiorari jurisdiction over the grant or denial of an authorization by a court of appeals to file a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Oral Advocates: For Petitioner: Andrew L. Adler, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. For Respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of judgment below as to Question 1: Kasdin M. Mitchell, Dallas, Tex. Link to Opinion: TBD. Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD. Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD. Timestamps: [00:00:00] Argument Preview [00:00:47] Argument Begins [00:00:55] Petitioner Opening Statement [00:02:46] Petitioner Free for All Questions [00:23:01] Petitioner Sequential Questions [00:36:49] Respondent Opening Statement [00:39:09] Respondent Free for All Questions [01:03:04] Respondent Sequential Questions [01:14:14] Court-Appointed Amicus Opening Statement [01:16:15] Court-Appointed Amicus Free for All Questions [01:27:23] Court-Appointed Amicus Sequential Questions [01:28:11] Petitioner Rebuttal