May 2, 1997: NASA - Richard C. Hoagland & Dr. Tom Van Flandern

Richard C. Hoagland and Dr. Tom Van Flandern respond to NASA's previous night appearance with alternative perspectives on space science and institutional policies. Van Flandern presents his exploded planet hypothesis, suggesting comets originate from destroyed planetary bodies rather than primordial solar system debris. His theory proposes that salt water detected in comets indicates oceanic origins from exploded planets, challenging conventional dirty snowball models. Hoagland criticizes NASA's historical pattern of denying potentially revolutionary discoveries, citing the Face on Mars as an example of institutional resistance to paradigm-shifting evidence. Both guests express frustration with NASA's tendency toward denial rather than investigation when confronted with anomalous findings. Van Flandern explains how his comet theory better explains observed comet behavior and composition, particularly the surprising sodium tail discoveries in Hale-Bopp. The conversation explores broader questions about scientific orthodoxy and institutional resistance to new ideas that challenge established cosmological models. Hoagland argues that NASA's approach reflects deeper problems with how scientific institutions handle potentially transformative discoveries. The discussion examines the relationship between mainstream science and alternative theories, questioning whether institutional biases prevent serious consideration of revolutionary possibilities. Their dialogue represents a fundamental challenge to conventional understanding of solar system formation and evolution.