About this episode
The recent Supreme Court ruling has significant implications for the structure of the U.S. government, potentially reshaping the balance of power between the presidency and independent agencies. This landmark decision not only strengthens presidential authority but also challenges the precedent set by Humphrey's Executor v. United States, which has traditionally protected agency heads from arbitrary dismissal. The ruling signals a decisive shift towards a "unitary executive theory," allowing the president greater control over federal agencies, thereby diminishing the influence of unelected bureaucrats in governance. – Join me and Ross Givens this Thursday, September 25th, at 3pm EST and learn how you can use the same insider information Pelosi and others have used to make MILLIONS. You’re not going to want to miss out on this once in a lifetime FREE TRAINING! Click this link to register TODAY!! https://turleytalksinsidertrading.com/registration/?tambid=18762 *The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* Get exclusive updates & behind-the-scenes content! Sign up at https://turley.pub/news Highlights: "The Supreme Court ruling grants unprecedented power to the president over independent agencies." "Humphrey's Executor v. United States faces potential overturning, altering nearly a century of precedent." "The unitary executive theory restores the president's control over agency functions and policies." "The conservative majority in the Supreme Court is actively supporting the expansion of presidential power." – Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review. FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter **The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy