About this episode
Today's daf is sponsored by Judy Shapiro in loving memory of her father Albert Tychman, z"l on his 17th yahrzeit. "He would love that on this day of his yahrzeit, my husband and I are enroute to Israel to visit our daughter and her family. He was very proud of all his grandchildren." Today's daf is sponsored by Lesley Glassberg Nadel in loving memory of her sister Ruth Lewis, Rachel bar Berel haLevi v'Tova, whose yahrzeit is Kislev 7. "May her memory be blessed." Today's daf is sponsored by Shira Dishon in memory of her son, Eitan Ben Shira, hy"d, on his first yahrzeit. 'Eitan was a student at the Kiryat Shmona Yeshiva, which he loved so much. In a wonderfully symbolic way, a day after the memorial, the Kiryat Shmona Yeshiva, which was evacuated to the center of the country for more than a year, returns to Kiryat Shmona with joy and dancing. Surely Eitan will join the joyful dancing from above." The Gemara continues to examine the details of a braita discussing different interpretations of unclear language in a document regarding dinarim , specifically whether the document was referring to silver or gold dinarim . In resolving a difficulty with the braita, a distinction is drawn between ' dinarei ' (gold) and ' dinarim ' (silver). To further support this distinction, a Mishna in Keritut is cited, which describes how Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel modified a law, relating to the sacrifices of a mother who had given birth and a zava, to break the market price on birds that had risen to an astronomical level. The Mishna explains a principle regarding document interpretation: when there is a contradiction between the text at the top and bottom of a document, the bottom text is followed. This is based on the assumption that the change was intentional, reflecting a deliberate modification by the seller or creditor. The purpose of writing the top section is to assist in deciphering any missing letters or numbers in the bottom section. A braita further qualifies this principle, limiting such corrections to a single letter or number. If two letters or numbers are changed, it would be interpreted as a deliberate modification from the document's outset, and the text at the end would be followed or perhaps the document would be deemed invalid. In a specific case, a document came before the court stating "six hundred and one zuz ." The precise denomination of the six hundred was unclear. Abaye ruled that it did not refer to prutot , as large numbers of prutot are typically not written in documents but are converted to larger denominations. Given the remaining possibilities of sela (four dinarim ) coins or zuzim (one dinar ), Abaye ruled to follow the lesser amount. This decision was based on the principle that the party holding the document has a weaker position and cannot demand money from the other side without clear proof.