About this episode
The Mishna rules that if an animal falls into someone's property and benefits, the owner pays for the benefit but not the damage caused. What type of benefit is the Mishna discussing - eating or that the produce softened the fall, or both? How does this (softening the fall) differ from one who chases a lion away from destroying another's property, for which one receives no compensation at all? If the animal moved to a different garden bed and ate there - is the owner still exempt from damages and only pays what the owner benefited? There are several different opinions about what stage the owner becomes liable for damages. How does one assess the payment for damages of produce growing in a field? One opinion is that it is evaluated based on that produce being in a field of a beit seah which is in a field that can hold sixty seah sixty seah . Others hold something similar but with minor adaptations. The rabbis question whether this assessment method is used also for a person who damages another's field or only if it is damage caused by property.