About this episode
No Rahimi decision yet … but Sarah and David have the next best thing: math! The two dive into Sarah’s recent POLITICO piece in which she and Dean Jens used data to analyze the Supreme Court. The Agenda: —The three-body problem —Was Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization radical? —Moneyballing the court — “Right to counsel” at the 9th Circuit — Racial discrimination in contracting —Test cases are test cases — Judge Newsom’s “unusual” concurrence — Judge Easterbrook on fonts —The health of the Constitution Show Notes: — Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum — Connelly v. United States — Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe — National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo — Allen v. Milligan — New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen — Creative LLC v. Elenis — Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission — Chief Justice John Roberts’ thoughts on AI — Pacific Legal Foundation Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch , a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch ’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content— click here . Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices